In the quest for more meaningful human engagement on social media platforms, there has been a growing trend of algorithm-free networks like Spread and PI.FYI. These platforms do not allow brands or bots, and they do not support advertisements. The primary aim of Spread is to focus on indicators of genuine human interaction rather than maximizing time spent on the site. By measuring success through actions like clicking on another user’s recommendation and subsequently signing up for a newsletter or subscription, Spread aims to create a space where users can engage meaningfully with content.
Given the overload of information on traditional social media platforms, there is a sense of nostalgia for the simplicity of early social networks. Jonathan Stray, a senior scientist at the UC Berkeley Center for Human-Compatible AI, believes that the chronological feed model may not necessarily be the best solution. He warns that simpler feeds can lead to recency bias and spam. While he acknowledges that algorithmic curation does not always result in social harm, Stray agrees with the notion that the relentless pursuit of user engagement may not always lead to desirable outcomes.
Interestingly, Stray proposes that the solution to the challenges posed by social media algorithms may actually lie in developing more sophisticated algorithms. This viewpoint contradicts the trend towards algorithm-free platforms and suggests that algorithmic curation can be used to prioritize socially desirable outcomes. In an effort to promote the development of such algorithms, Stray launched the Prosocial Ranking Challenge, offering a substantial prize fund to encourage innovation in this area.
While algorithm-free platforms like Spread and PI.FYI are gaining traction, there is also evidence of users seeking out chronological feeds on mainstream social media sites. Group messaging, in particular, has become a popular alternative to curated feeds, offering a more intimate and controlled space for sharing content. However, group chats themselves can give rise to echo chambers and biases, as users naturally gravitate towards information that aligns with their existing beliefs.
Despite the appeal of algorithm-free social spaces, the quest for the perfect information feed remains elusive. As users navigate between algorithmic feeds, chronological timelines, and group chats, the complexity of user engagement continues to evolve. The desire for meaningful interactions and quality content remains at the core of this debate, prompting both users and platforms to rethink their approaches to social media engagement.
The impact of algorithm-free social networks on user engagement is a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration. While algorithm-free platforms offer an alternative to traditional social media, they are not without their own set of challenges. As the quest for the perfect information feed continues, it is clear that user engagement is a dynamic and ever-evolving landscape that will continue to shape the future of social media platforms.
Leave a Reply