Today’s hearing on child safety held by the Senate Judiciary Committee was dedicated to addressing the potential dangers that various online platforms pose to children. With prominent CEOs from X, Meta, Snap, TikTok, and Discord in attendance, the discussion aimed to raise awareness about child protection. The hearing was filled with emotional appeals, considering the presence of families who have experienced their children being targeted or harmed online. However, the focus of the hearing was overshadowed by a predictable and unrelated tangent regarding the ownership of TikTok by Chinese company ByteDance, derailing the purpose of the event.
Despite the primary objective of the hearing being child safety, the discussion veered off track when lawmakers began raising concerns about TikTok’s data storage policies and Chinese government influence over its moderation. While it is essential to examine these concerns, the hearing took a detour by attempting to emphasize TikTok’s foreign origins, rather than addressing specific child safety issues. The involvement of Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) was particularly perplexing, as he aggressively questioned TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew about his citizenship and membership in the Chinese Communist Party, despite it being widely known that Chew is Singaporean.
Senator Cotton repeatedly questioned Chew about his citizenship, demanding to know where his passport was from and whether he had applied for citizenship in China or the US. Chew maintained his composure and emphasized his Singaporean identity throughout the hearing. The line of questioning employed by Senator Cotton was reminiscent of McCarthy-era tactics, a point aptly made by The Washington Post’s Drew Harwell. Chew’s relationship to China had already been thoroughly discussed during his previous appearance before Congress, raising the question of why Cotton chose to revisit this topic during a hearing explicitly dedicated to child safety.
The tangent regarding Chew’s citizenship and its relation to the Chinese Communist Party detracted from the dialogue about child protection and exposed a disconcerting emphasis on his foreignness. The problem with this line of inquiry lies not only in its irrelevance to the topic but also in the underlying assumption that a foreign origin automatically translates into potential security threats. Directing the conversation towards Chew’s nationality evokes stereotypes and undermines the goal of addressing child safety effectively.
While it may be important to scrutinize TikTok’s data storage policies, conflating this issue with Chew’s citizenship distracts from the core objective of the hearing. Concerns about data security are valid; however, they should be explored in a manner that is detached from personal attacks. Singling out TikTok due to its Chinese ownership seems misguided when other major companies, such as Apple, have faced similar critiques about their relationship with the Chinese government without resorting to questioning their CEOs’ political affiliations.
The line of questioning employed during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on child safety demonstrates a clear attempt to exploit Chew’s foreignness instead of focusing on the vital issue of protecting children online. By sidestepping the fundamental purpose of the hearing, lawmakers engaged in a series of inquiries that deviated from the intended objective. Child safety should remain the central concern, and efforts such as Project Texas, TikTok’s data security initiative, should be evaluated and discussed constructively to ensure the utmost protection for children while online.
Although it is crucial to scrutinize the practices of online platforms and their impact on child safety, it is equally important to remain on topic during hearings dedicated to specific subjects. The attempt to connect Chew’s foreign origins to child safety lacked substance and detracted from the overall purpose. By focusing on relevant issues and maintaining a constructive approach, lawmakers can better address the challenges posed by online platforms and take appropriate steps to protect children in the digital age.
Leave a Reply