In an age increasingly dominated by technology, the evolution of writing platforms like Substack reflects significant changes not only in how content is produced but also in how it is perceived. Substack has carved a niche for itself as a preferred platform for independent writers and content creators. However, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) raises questions about the authenticity and integrity of written content. While Substack has not articulated a formal policy regarding AI’s utilization within its ecosystem, its co-founder Hamish McKenzie has acknowledged the imperative for writers to confront the rapid advancements in generative AI technology. He emphasizes an irrefutable truth: regardless of opinion, AI is reshaping the writing landscape.
Among the Substack community, AI’s role can be identified as twofold: as an enhancer of productivity and as a tool for content refinement. Writers have indicated a preference for using AI not as a primary creator but as an assistive tool that improves the quality of their work. Commenting on this trend, David Skilling, who leads the soccer newsletter Original Football, likens AI to a supportive editor. This analogy illustrates a pivotal point—AI is a means to cut through the noise of busy schedules, allowing writers to focus on crafting their unique voices while benefiting from the efficiency AI tools can bring to the editing process.
This sentiment resonates across various newsletters. Subham Panda, representing Spotlight by Xartup, echoes the belief that AI serves to expedite content curation and enrich multimedia aspects—namely imagery—while leaving the critical narrative construction to human writers. The blend of AI assistance and human oversight ensures that the hallmark of good writing—personal touch and insight—remains intact.
Many Substack authors utilize AI tools to subordinate their rough drafts into polished finished products. Max Avery, a contributor to Strategic Wealth Briefing With Jake Claver, notes that AI tools like Hemingway Editor Plus help eliminate stylistic errors and enhance clarity. This perspective underscores the importance of AI technology not as a replacement for human creativity, but as a facilitator for improved execution. Similarly, financial entrepreneur Josh Belanger leverages ChatGPT and customized AI models to navigate the complexities inherent in technical writing.
For authors in specialized fields, the challenge lies in balancing AI’s capabilities with the nuanced understanding and context that human writers possess, particularly in finance and trading. Belanger’s approach to prompt engineering—a technique that sharpens the relevance and accuracy of AI responses—highlights the significant role of human oversight in the AI-assisted writing process.
Interestingly, Substack’s community appears more conservative in embracing AI-generated content than some competing platforms. The utilization of generative AI on Medium, for instance, accounts for nearly 40 percent of its content, a stark contrast to the lower prevalence observed in Substack newsletters. This discrepancy raises strategic questions regarding value propositions and content originality.
Writers on Substack may prioritize authenticity highly, wary of the possible implications of heavy reliance on AI tools. Moreover, the potential for audience perception plays a pivotal role; readers may seek authentic, unmediated experiences from their favorite writers.
The intersection of AI and writing not only invites innovation but also poses ethical considerations regarding content authenticity and attribution. While emerging technologies can greatly enhance productivity, they also necessitate transparency in how content is curated and generated. As Substack navigates this new landscape, the decisions made by its writers in embracing or resisting AI tools will certainly shape the platform’s future.
The landscape of writing on Substack is being reshaped by AI, prompting writers to adapt to new methodologies while holding firm to their unique voices. The balance between technology and creativity is delicate—is AI a tool for empowerment or a threat to authentic expression? Ultimately, it appears that the answer lies in how writers choose to wield these evolving technologies.
Leave a Reply